Originally published on Drovers
The opinions in this commentary are those of Dan Murphy, a veteran journalist and commentator.
The Heartbreak of Vegetarianism
Although it paints something of a grim picture of the vegetarian community, a new study on the psychological impact of giving up animal foods isn’t anything to celebrate.
However, the study — though conducted on a small sample of students — did demonstrate that giving up meat-eating tends to be associated with a bleaker, less upbeat perspective on life, and if nothing else, it’s a sobering counterpoint to the pervasive mantra that going vegan is wholly redemptive for both people and the planet.
Turns out, choosing to go vegetarian may end up driving participants to internalize an outlook on life that’s even more depressing than it might otherwise be.
Titled, “Relationships between vegetarian dietary habits and daily well-being,” the study’s authors, who are research psychologists at UCLA and the College of William and Mary, found that vegetarians are generally “more miserable than meat-eaters, have lower self-esteem and may be less psychologically well-adjusted.”
Researchers asked 400 college students, a mix of vegetarians, meat-eaters and what they called “semi-vegetarians” to record their feelings over the course of two weeks. The goal was to examine differences in the daily experiences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians.
Here’s how the authors of the study, which was which published in the current edition of the journal Ecology of Food and Nutrition, collected their data:
Depressed and disillusioned
At the end of each day, students “described how they felt and how they thought about themselves that day.” They then detailed the various events that happened to them that day.
The researchers found that people who avoided eating any meat or fish reported lower self-esteem, lower psychological adjustment, less “meaning” in life and experienced more negative moods than those students in the study who ate meat or fish.
“Vegetarians also reported more negative social experiences than omnivores and semi-vegetarians,” they noted. “Although women were more likely than men to identify as vegetarians and semi-vegetarians, controlling for participant gender did not change the results of the analyses.”
The authors concluded that, “The differences we found are consistent with other research that suggests that vegetarians are less psychologically well-adjusted than non-vegetarians.”
See the full article here
You may also like
Utah rancher makes the case against BLM’s illegal conservation rule
Government bans cheap incandescent bulbs, replaces them with toxic CFLs and expensive LEDs
Feds storm Amish farm for selling traditionally grown meat, milk, produce
Politics and ignorance driving wolf and grizzly endangered status
BLM proposes a rule that could decimate grazing and other multiple uses of public lands