#1 – LaVOY FINICUM’S DEATH WAS COMPLETELY UNJUSTIFIED. May he rest in peace.
Compelling new forensic evidence shows what really happened. WATCH THE VIDEOS.
Based on the Constitutional presumption of innocence until proven guilty, the outcome of the Oregon Standoff Trial, in which the Defendants were unanimously found Not-Guilty, clearly demonstrates that LaVoy Finicum’s involvement in the Refuge Occupation was not unlawful. While the federal government continues to exercise and apply excessive force to people involved at every opportunity (witness the treatment of Attorney Marcus Mumford), the FBI is still distorting and trying to dodge the truth about what really happened to LaVoy. There were no arrest warrants, and at this point, based on the outcome of the trial, obviously there was no legitimate probable cause or any legally justifiable basis for the stop. The entire operation was a Fourth Amendment violation. And the intentional escalation and excessive force used to kill LaVoy were much worse.
What a bittersweet result the trial verdict must be for the Finicum Family.
Now, the Federal Government, Governor Kate Brown, and the Oregon State Police need to be tried and held accountable not only for LaVoy’s death, but for the Elaborate Cover-up they have engaged in regarding the real facts regarding his shooting.
#2 – IN OUR GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM OF SO-CALLED CHECKS AND BALANCES AND SEPARATION OF POWERS, FROM START TO FINISH THE JURY VERDICT WAS THE FIRST CHECK GOVERNMENT HAS EXPERIENCED REGARDING ITS ABUSE OF POWER IN THE CASE.
#3 – IN HARNEY COUNTY THERE WAS A TOTAL BREAKDOWN OF SEPARATION OF POWERS.
#4 – FEDERAL OVERREACH AND ABUSE OF POWER (and ARROGANCE) ARE REAL — AND GETTING WORSE.
#5 – AMMON BUNDY, RYAN BUNDY, DAVID FRY & OTHER INCARCERATED DEFENDANTS ARE/WERE INDEED POLITICAL PRISONERS.
#6 – INJUSTICES TO THE HAMMONDS SHOULD NOT BE FORGOTTEN, AND CONTINUED ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN TO ADDRESS THEIR CONTINUED INCARCERATION & SITUATION.
AND #7 – HARNEY COUNTY NEEDS A NEW SHERIFF – Harney County Seriously Needs a New Sheriff!
The Real Conspirators ^^^^^^
You may also like
Forest Service “maliciously” targeting and prosecuting South Dakota ranchers
Even with a million-mile lifetime range, nobody wants EVs
Biden’s “patriotism” is the very definition of treason
Chevron doctrine based bureaucratic rules could soon be overturned
Land Grabs: The Antiquities Act is no longer about protecting antiquities
9 thoughts on “Biggest Initial Takeaways from the Oregon Standoff Trial”
Comments are closed.
Indeed, many are the RINO’s and paper tigers.
Governer Kate Brown has Lavoy’s blood on her hands as well as the actual shooters.
it was her whining about the incident costing too much money and insisting action be taken asap.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
Salute sir!
“It should be known that all 12 jurors felt that this verdict was a statement regarding the various failures of the prosecution to prove ‘conspiracy’ in the count itself – and not any form of affirmation of the defense’s various beliefs, actions or aspirations,” Juror 4 wrote Friday, in a lengthy email to The Oregonian/OregonLive.
http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/10/juror_4_prosecutors_in_oregon.html
I read Juror #4 statement. His writings were nothing more than a self-absorbed pity party. He should never had a seat in that case, as he was NOT a peer. No Government employee (retired or not) should ever be allowed on any jury for a private citizen…..his bias was more than obvious.
I’m confused. Juror 4 or Juror 11? Or both? It was Juror 11 who was the government employee and stated that he was “very biased.”
Great job Todd. Looking forward to what this means to all our efforts to educate people about their rights and how we can move forward to a better and more free rural America. Proud to know and work with you!! Tim
Thank you Todd for all your unselfish and unrecognized efforts that you make on behalf of all the rancher and allotment owners.